from Unknown Author
For the latest in the school roofing scam in Indiana, see:
http://diana-vice.blogspot.com/2008/05/straight-from-horses-mouth.htm
The link does not work, although the address is correct. Please cut and paste or go to her blogspot and look under the Wednesday, May 21, 2008 entry, "Straight From the Horse's Mouth". Her blogspot is at: http://diana-vice.blogspot.com
The State Attorney General (Steve Carter) in Indiana had an unusual meeting today with the Taxpayer Group in Indiana exposing the scam there - at the home of Diana Vice.
Apparently, the Indiana State Attorney General told the group that:
1. Tremco operatives read too much into a comment made by his spokesperson that was printed in a newspaper report, and that it was not meant as an exoneration of any wrong doing.
Unfortunately, Tremco made assertions in a recent court case that they were exonerated and that assertion was taken as gospel by one justice, hurting that person's case terribly.
2. He cannot prosecute the those involved in the scams until their State Board of Accounts (State Auditors) gives him what he needs....and in California, that takes three years IF allowed by politicians - the Joint LEGISLATIVE Audit Committee - and if another politician, the State Attorney General, was inclined to prosecute.
In California, the political State Attorney General is a member of the Roofer's Union in the SF Bay Area, as his family owned a roofing contracting business. He never revealed that information nor recused himself from any investigations. He is now in the position where those who become Governor wait to run - he is State Treasurer.
3. The Indiana State Attorney General also told the Taxpayer Group that local prosecutors had to prosecute, and the local prosecutors have told the taxpayer group that they could not, only the State Attorney General could.
See how this works?
Pointing fingers while time runs out.
Same thing in California....same putting off prosecutions till the statute of limitations runs out, all the while it's wildly rampant statewide here in CA - ongoing....
See how that works? Judges "rely" on a politician's word, destroying someone's valid case, similar to how the University of California did my case....and it's all buddy-buddy.....
One wonders how that whole concept squares with our Constitution, which has clearly demarcated lines of responsibilities between the three branches of Government, to serve as a "checks and balances" system.
But when conflicts of interest are involved, wherever there are those elected to offices in this modern age, there cannot be a reliance on the word of such for a "checks and balances" and therefore, it appears that the Indiana Court systems are as defiled as they are in California.
Constitutional Rights are abrogated for what?
The people have the will to prosecute.
The politicians don't.
Sorry to see Indiana in the same boat as California.
Did Indianans want to be known for such wild west, reckless and unaccountable behaviour?